
PHOTOS BY RICHARD SOBOL/IFAW



|
|
|
EACH WINTER FOR THOUSANDS of years, gray whales have migrated
from the Arctic to the coastal lagoons of western Baja California Sur.
There, in the warm salty waters, remote and secluded, they breed, calve,
and prepare their young for the journey back to the Bering and Chukchi
Seas. This population of the Pacific gray whale, the last of the magnificent
gray whale species that once also inhabited the western Pacific and the
northern Atlantic, recently completed one of the most remarkable recoveries
on record. In 1994, more than 40 years after Mexico and the United States
agreed to ban commercial whaling, the Pacific gray whale was removed from
the federal endangered species list; returning from the brink of extinction,
it now numbers over 22,000.
As the whale has recovered,
however, its historic Baja calving habitat has been placed increasingly
at risk. At Guerrero Negro and Laguna Ojo de Liebre (Scammon's Lagoon),
urban spawl and a massive salt manufacturing facility are long established;
at Bahía Magdalena, phosphate mining continues, and massive resort
development, with a major airport, is planned. Today only one Baja lagoon--Laguna
San Ignacio, 500 miles south of San Diego--remains in a virtually pristine
condition. The gray whale and 150 different waterfowl species coexist here
among the mangroves with fishing cooperatives and with a growing but strictly
regulated ecotourism industry whose viability is inextricably intertwined
with the whales' survival and recovery.
Since the late 1970s,
Laguna San Ignacio has become known as the home of the "friendly gray
whale," a gentle and playful descendant of the "devil fish"
that turned on the harpoon boats of whalers and smashed them with their
massive flukes. (Adults weigh over 40 tons and are up to 45 feet long;
their tongues can weigh 3,000 pounds.) Now, in the lagoon's protected confines,
the whales' fear of the harpoon has been replaced by curiosity, by countless
playful interactions with tourists, and by mutual trust and affection.
The need to protect Laguna
San Ignacio has long been recognized. In 1954, Mexico designated it a gray
whale sanctuary and banned whaling. In 1979, the federal government declared
the lagoon to be a "refuge for pregnant whales and calves, as well
as a marine tourism reserve." In 1988, Mexico's President Carlos Salinas
included Laguna San Ignacio in establishing El Vizcaíno Desert Biosphere
Reserve, the largest protected area in Latin America, equal in size to
the state of New Hampshire. That same year, UNESCO designated the lagoon
a World Heritage Site.
But this special place
is also the site proposed in 1994 by Mitsubishi Corporation, together with
Mexico, for construction of the world's largest salt manufacturing plant.
Through a jointly owned subsidiary, Exportadora de Sal, S.A. ("ESSA"),
Mitsubishi wants to build an evaporation facility that would produce an
estimated 7.1 million tons per year of salt for use in the manufacture
of chemicals, primarily in Japan. Noisy diesel pumps would be installed
on the lagoon to extract 462 million metric tons of water a year (6,600
gallons per second), possibly reducing the lagoon's salinity and affecting
the buoyancy and insulation it provides to the whales.
If the plan goes through,
an estimated 116 square miles of evaporation ponds will be diked and bulldozed
into the landscape, disturbing wetlands, fisheries crucial to the local
human communities, and the habitats of rare or endangered terrestrial species.
A mile-long concrete pier will be constructed to receive tankers carrying
diesel fuel and oil and tankers exporting the salt. The surrounding fishing
communities would be swallowed up by the urban sprawl that inevitably accompanies
industrial development--as has already occurred at ESSA's Guerrero Negro
salt works. The local culture sustained by fishing will be a thing of the
past.
In June 1994, ESSA submitted
an Environmental Impact Assessment that dismissed the potential impacts
to the gray whale in 23 lines and summarily discounted the potential adverse
effects on the lagoon ecology. Six months later, after a fierce opposition
campaign headed by Mexico's leading environmental group, El Grupo de los
Cien (The Group of 100), ESSA's application for project approval was rejected
by Mexico's National Ecology Institute (INE), part of the newly created
Ministry of Fisheries, Natural Resources, and Environment (SEMARNAP). INE
found that a new Environmental Impact Assessment is required. In February
1996, the environmental review process began again, this time with the
assistance of an international panel of scientists appointed by SEMARNAP.
Mexico's commitment to
protecting this unique natural area is indicated by the designation of
the lagoon as a sanctuary and a biological reserve, as well as by the rejection
of ESSA's original environmental impact assessment. SEMARNAP Director Julia
Carabias Lillo is well regarded by conservationists inside and outside
Mexico. Yet the country is in the throes of economic and political turmoil,
and the pressures to approve the project are powerful. As the environmental
review process moves forward, project opponents fear the government's commitment
to the sanctuary may be undermined.
To Mitsubishi, the lagoon's
uniqueness has not proved a compelling reason to look elsewhere for salt.
The company contends that the whales will not be jeopardized. The Natural
Resources Defense Council has met repeatedly with Mitsubishi executives
to urge that they find another site, but they have refused to do so. Project
opponents are now considering economic and political incentives to persuade
Mitsubishi to change its mind. There are a lot of places in the world to
make salt--Mitsubishi concedes that--but there is only one undisturbed
place remaining where the gray whale can breed. The fate of Laguna San
Ignacio--and the fate of the Pacific gray whale--will depend on what we
can do, individually and collectively, to defend them. 
Joel R. Reynolds, a senior attorney with the Natural Resources
Defense Council in Los Angeles, heads NRDC's Southern California Coastal
Ecosystem Project. For more information on this controversy, see www.nrdc.org
|
|